Surety Bond Forums - JW Surety Bonds

Performance Bonds - Contractor Versus Surety Liability on Performance Bonds


Go Back   Surety Bond Forums > Contract Bonds > Performance Bonds

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2008, 07:34 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Default Contractor Versus Surety Liability on Performance Bonds

Situation: A contractor on a federal contract is terminated for default and the surety elects not to take on the completion of the contract themself. The federal agency conducts a competitive bid process to complete the effort, and the results of these actions increase the cost to the government beyond the performance bond. If the bonding company was to pay the government for the amount up to the performance bond amount does the bonding company then assess these additional costs to the original contractor, and does the government assess the above bonding amount directly to the contractor, thus resulting in the contractor being obligated for the full amount of the excess costs ?

Secondly it is my understanding that the government can simply lay the entire debt directly to the defaulting contractor.

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Free Surety Bond Quotes
Apply Online Now
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-22-2008, 05:41 PM
Surety Professional
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 558
Default Performance Bonds

Quote:
Originally Posted by morning
Situation: A contractor on a federal contract is terminated for default and the surety elects not to take on the completion of the contract themself. The federal agency conducts a competitive bid process to complete the effort, and the results of these actions increase the cost to the government beyond the performance bond. If the bonding company was to pay the government for the amount up to the performance bond amount does the bonding company then assess these additional costs to the original contractor, and does the government assess the above bonding amount directly to the contractor, thus resulting in the contractor being obligated for the full amount of the excess costs ?

Secondly it is my understanding that the government can simply lay the entire debt directly to the defaulting contractor.

Thanks
When a contractor defaults on a bonded job, it is the Surety's decision whether they will take on the completion or not. If they choose not to, and the government gets it done, the Surety will be responsible for the completion - including the additional costs to the original contractor. At that time, the Surety will most definitely go back to the contractor to recoup the additional costs. Bottom line? The contractor is responsible for the entire project!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Free Surety Bond Quotes
Apply Online Now
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2005-2008 JW Bond Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved.