Click to verify BBB accreditation and to see a BBB report.
Follow us on twitter!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1

    Contractor Versus Surety Liability on Performance Bonds

    Situation: A contractor on a federal contract is terminated for default and the surety elects not to take on the completion of the contract themself. The federal agency conducts a competitive bid process to complete the effort, and the results of these actions increase the cost to the government beyond the performance bond. If the bonding company was to pay the government for the amount up to the performance bond amount does the bonding company then assess these additional costs to the original contractor, and does the government assess the above bonding amount directly to the contractor, thus resulting in the contractor being obligated for the full amount of the excess costs ?

    Secondly it is my understanding that the government can simply lay the entire debt directly to the defaulting contractor.

    Thanks

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    558

    Performance Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by morning
    Situation: A contractor on a federal contract is terminated for default and the surety elects not to take on the completion of the contract themself. The federal agency conducts a competitive bid process to complete the effort, and the results of these actions increase the cost to the government beyond the performance bond. If the bonding company was to pay the government for the amount up to the performance bond amount does the bonding company then assess these additional costs to the original contractor, and does the government assess the above bonding amount directly to the contractor, thus resulting in the contractor being obligated for the full amount of the excess costs ?

    Secondly it is my understanding that the government can simply lay the entire debt directly to the defaulting contractor.

    Thanks
    When a contractor defaults on a bonded job, it is the Surety's decision whether they will take on the completion or not. If they choose not to, and the government gets it done, the Surety will be responsible for the completion - including the additional costs to the original contractor. At that time, the Surety will most definitely go back to the contractor to recoup the additional costs. Bottom line? The contractor is responsible for the entire project!

Similar Threads

  1. Contractor bonds
    By bad2thebond in forum Contractor's Corner
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 02:41 PM
  2. Bond Versus Insurance in Ohio
    By Bond Guy in forum Motor Vehicle Dealer Bonds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-26-2008, 11:51 AM
  3. Subdivision Bonds & Contract Performance Bonds.
    By Harley in forum Subdivision Bonds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 01:45 PM
  4. Joint Liability with Surety Judgement
    By mscubo2000 in forum Executor/Administrator Bonds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-01-2007, 04:20 PM
  5. A Surety Bond Will Help Finish What A Contractor Failed To
    By Surety Guy in forum Surety Bond News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2005, 09:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC1 PL1