Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Surety Queen That's a tough question. All it takes is for one company to say that a trucking company hasn't paid them for a claim to arise. It seems to happen quite often. Because of the higher number of claims, Surety companies do consider it somewhat hazardous. |
The "hazard" is primarily the number of claims and not the severity of them. There is a high incidence of transposed numbers on records which makes records reconciliation difficult - if the payment of tariffs is delayed as a result, bingo, you've got a claim and the involvement of an additional level of staff at the bond company - thus, increasing expenses. Consequently, the letter of credit option is the most efficient solution for the need. The bonds are written from time to time for very large, financially sound companies, but even then, any claims activity, real or nuisance, will result in cancellation.